Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000167›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2025

Results From a Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of ANX005, a C1q Inhibitor, in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

Quazi Deen Mohammad, Zhahirul Islam, Nowshin Papri, Shoma Hayat, Israt Jahan, Khan Abul Kalam Azad, Dean R Artis, Benjamin Hoehn, Eric Humphriss, Ping Lin and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Acute Management of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Disability Scale.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Quazi Deen MohammadNational Institute of Neurosciences & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zhahirul IslamLaboratory of Gut-Brain Axis, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-8079
Nowshin PapriLaboratory of Gut-Brain Axis, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shoma HayatLaboratory of Gut-Brain Axis, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Israt JahanLaboratory of Gut-Brain Axis, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Khan Abul Kalam AzadDhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dean R ArtisAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.
Benjamin HoehnAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.
Eric HumphrissAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.
Ping LinAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.
Ted YednockAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.
Henk-André KroonAnnexon Bioscience, Brisbane, California, USA.

Funding

Annexon Biosciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune peripheral neuropathy driven by autoantibodies and classical complement pathway activation. Despite treatments with intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange, GBS remains characterized by variability in recovery and high incidence of residual disabilities. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ANX005, a novel therapeutic targeting the classical complement cascade.

methodsPatients with recent-onset GBS, who had no access to intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange, received escalating doses of ANX005 or placebo as a single IV infusion. Primary objectives included assessments of safety. Secondary objectives included determination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and clinical outcomes through Week 8. Exploratory objectives included an evaluation of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) complement and tissue damage biomarkers.

resultsFifty patients were randomized to receive either ANX005 (n = 38) or placebo (n = 12). ANX005 was well-tolerated across all doses with no dose-limiting toxicities, suggesting an acceptable safety profile. Pharmacodynamic data showed effective C1q inhibition and a reduction in neurofilament light chain levels, suggesting nerve damage mitigation. Exploratory endpoints evaluating clinical outcomes included improvements in Medical Research Council sum scores, GBS-Disability Score, and Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale with ANX005 compared to placebo, particularly in patients receiving doses that inhibited serum C1q for ≥ 1 week and provided C1q blockade in the CSF.

interpretationThese results support ANX005 as a targeted therapy for GBS that modulates the classical complement pathway. Further investigation in a larger Phase 3 trial is warranted to confirm these results and assess the long-term benefits of complement inhibition in patients with GBS.

Indexed as

Complement C1qComplement Inactivating AgentsGuillain-Barre SyndromeAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultComplement C1qComplement Inactivating AgentsANX005C1qcomplementGuillain–Barré syndromePhase 1

Identifiers

PMID40000167
PMCPMC11886941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.