ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Promoting equitable genetic testing in ovarian cancer: the demonstration of improvement for molecular ovarian cancer testing (DEMO) project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parallel genetic testing (testing for both tumour and germline gene changes) after the diagnosis of ovarian cancer should be considered the standard of care and is crucial to support treatment decisions. The demonstration of improvement for molecular ovarian cancer testing (DEMO) project aimed to develop patient-focused tools to promote equitable genetic care in diverse communities with high proportions of patients with limited English proficiency and biopsy guidelines to address the variations in specimen quality in different geographical regions in the UK. Our three work packages (WP) aimed to promote awareness by addressing the information gaps in different community groups (WP1), develop infrastructure to evaluate the different tissue collection pathways in different regions (WP2) and support continuing professional development (CPD) to encourage best practices with the involvement of patients (WP3). Our output included a multimedia multilanguage information package with paired National Health Service-branded written materials to support genetic testing after ovarian cancer diagnosis (https://ovarian.org.uk/demo-uk/), a scalable database to enable a multisite audit of parallel genetic testing pathways and a collection of CPD events that had patient involvement as an essential component. In addition, we have collaborated with patient and community groups to contribute to a national consensus guidance on genetic testing in ovarian cancer. Our co-production work has been recognised by local and regional awards as an exemplar for patient and public involvement (PPI). This has supported the start of a legacy co-production group in gynaeoncology (https://www.dhlnetwork.com/gohildas) to address the critical unmet need for sustainable and equity-oriented PPI to advocate for underserved communities. The DEMO project has contributed to raising awareness of the importance of equitable genetic care in ovarian cancer. We will continue to build on this groundwork to support future quality improvement projects and research, with the ultimate goal of improving the outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.