ArticleBMJ case reports2025
Visceral leishmaniasis mimicking inflammatory myositis that led to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) is a heterogeneous group of immune-mediated diseases that mainly affect the skeletal muscles and skin. This case report narrates the story of a middle-aged man who presented with fever, weight loss, muscle weakness and skin rash and was treated elsewhere for probable dermatomyositis with steroids, methotrexate and rituximab. He presented to our facility with persistent fever and hyperpigmented skin rash. Detailed re-evaluation ultimately led to the final diagnosis of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis due to visceral leishmaniasis. He was treated with liposomal amphotericin B. The patient responded well to treatment and did not require further immunosuppression during follow-up. This case highlights the importance of carefully recognising atypical findings to differentiate the IIM from its mimics, particularly infections in endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.