ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Feasibility of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Non-Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Reply to "Comments on: 'Pre-anesthesia pleth variability index and perfusion index for predicting post-induction hypotension in elderly surgical patients: a cohort study'".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comments on: "Pre-anesthesia pleth variability index and perfusion index for predicting post-induction hypotension in elderly surgical patients: a cohort study".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Susceptibility of Large Language Models to User-Driven Factors in Medical Queries.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Diverse Surgical Populations: A Multiclass Classification Universal Model Using Machine Learning Techniques.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries. MATERIALS AND
methodsPreoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an open-source registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers.
resultsA total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767-0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763-0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743-0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669-0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all
conclusionML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.