Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999957›Full record

Trial reportJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention for Older People With Frailty Discharged From Hospital-A Theory-Based Evaluation.

Rikke Larsen Rasmussen, Laurine Nilsson, Mette Holst, Morten Villumsen, Jane Andreasen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rikke Larsen RasmussenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1639-5831
Laurine NilssonDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-7237
Mette HolstCenter for Nutrition and Intestinal Failure, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-9458
Morten VillumsenCenter for Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Marselisborg Rehabilitation Center, Aarhus Municipality, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-0663
Jane AndreasenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-1553

Funding

The study was funded by the Association of Danish Physiotherapists and Center for Applied Community Health Research, Aalborg, Denmark. The funding parties were not involved in the design or reporting of results.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleOlder people with frailty are at high risk of functional decline, readmissions, and other adverse health outcomes, after acute hospitalisation. Interventions should focus on strength training and nutrition, but knowledge is needed on designing sustainable interventions after discharge. AIMS AND

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore what healthcare professionals perceive as central for making a newly developed complex training, social, and nutritional intervention work effectively using theory-based evaluation. The intervention was a RCT study including 119 participants.

methodsNine semi-structured interviews and three follow-up meetings were conducted with healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, senior activity employees, dietician) who performed the intervention. Interviews were analysed for Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome configurations, and findings were compared with the initial programme theory.

resultsThe training and social elements of the intervention seemed to largely function as intended. According to the healthcare professionals, the mechanisms for the training intervention were successful experiences, the approach of the physiotherapists, and the atmosphere and interactions between participants, leading to increased self-efficacy and motivation for continuing. However, goal setting and test results were used differently as motivational tools. The social intervention was perceived to work through feeling part of a community and well received in the centre. The perceived mechanisms for the nutritional intervention were increased knowledge and feelings of being seen and heard, although it seems that the impact was mixed.

conclusionAccording to the involved healthcare professionals, the complex training, social, and nutritional intervention seemed to work well for older people with frailty, although the nutritional intervention was received differently. The important mechanisms were the social element and the personal approach of the physiotherapists, which perceivably prompted training efforts and results and yielded good mental outcomes. The organisation of a similar multicomponent intervention should consider integrating the nutritional intervention and frame the use of goal setting and testing further. The findings provided novel insights to working mechanisms in multicomponent interventions for older people with frailty, especially regarding the social component, which may inform future interventions.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFrail ElderlyFrailtyHealth PersonnelPatient DischargeAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSelf Efficacycomplex interventionfrail elderlynutrition therapyresistance trainingsocial relationstheory‐based evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39999957
PMCPMC11858848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.