Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999674›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2025

Navigating confinement: Mechanotransduction and metabolic adaptation.

Alice Amitrano, Debanik Choudhury, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice AmitranoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Debanik ChoudhuryDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Konstantinos KonstantopoulosDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. Electronic address: konstant@jhu.edu.

Funding

The interplay of ion transporters and cytoskeleton in breast cancer migration and metastasisR01CA254193 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS, MARTIN, STUART S · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Viscotaxis: Novel cell migration mechanisms regulated by microenvironmental viscosityR01CA257647 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
Cell mechanobiology in confinement using an integration of bioengineering, materials systems and in vivo modelsR01GM142175 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
The interplay of extracellular fluid viscosity, stiffness and confinement in regulating cell responsesR35GM156305 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Konstantinos Konstantopoulos · 2025 to 2026
$959k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254193NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257647NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM142175NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration through confined spaces is a critical process influenced by the complex three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the local microenvironment and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). Cells in vivo experience diverse fluidic signals, such as extracellular fluid viscosity, hydraulic resistance, and shear forces, as well as solid cues, like ECM stiffness and viscoelasticity. These fluidic and solid stressors activate mechanotransduction processes and regulate cell migration. They also drive metabolic reprogramming, dynamically altering glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to meet the cell's energy demands in different microenvironments. This review discusses recent advances on the mechanisms of cell migration in confinement and how confinement-induced cellular behavior leads to metabolic reprogramming.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumans

Identifiers

PMID39999674
PMCPMC12105986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.