ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2025
Navigating confinement: Mechanotransduction and metabolic adaptation.
Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Microfluidic perspectives on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell migration in solid tumours: highlighting physical confinement as a key barrier.Molecular systems design & engineering · 2026Review
- Protocol for optogenetic stimulation of cells under physical confinement.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Compression-induced metabolic adaptation drives confined tumor cell migration and distant metastasis via malate-dependent microtubule reinforcement.Cell research · 2026Article
- Hydrostatic pressure reduces the mechanosensitivity of cell migration.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanical regulation of metabolism, epigenetics, and their interplay.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Engineered In Vitro Platforms for Mechanochemical Control of Cell Migration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell migration through confined spaces is a critical process influenced by the complex three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the local microenvironment and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). Cells in vivo experience diverse fluidic signals, such as extracellular fluid viscosity, hydraulic resistance, and shear forces, as well as solid cues, like ECM stiffness and viscoelasticity. These fluidic and solid stressors activate mechanotransduction processes and regulate cell migration. They also drive metabolic reprogramming, dynamically altering glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to meet the cell's energy demands in different microenvironments. This review discusses recent advances on the mechanisms of cell migration in confinement and how confinement-induced cellular behavior leads to metabolic reprogramming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.