ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Identifying Borderline Trachoma Grades Using a Three-Latent Class Model.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The WHO has a simplified grading system for assessing trachoma. However, even for experts, it can be difficult to classify certain cases as strictly positive or negative for a given grade. Given the absence of a true gold standard, we performed a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) on a set of 200 graded photos of the superior tarsal conjunctiva. Ten trained graders assessed the presence of two trachoma grades: trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI). The LCA was modeled in two different ways: first with two classes (presence/absence), and then with three classes, with the extra class presumed to represent a more discrepant "borderline" case. Cohen's κ-statistics measuring agreement between graders were calculated for TF and TI grades (separately) before and after removing the third latent class. The κ-statistic increased by 0.10 (95% CI = 0.72-0.85; P <0.001) for TF and 0.13 (95% CI = 0.81-0.90; P <0.001) for TI, indicating that the third latent class represented a discrepant-case borderline class. The identification of borderline grading cases using a three-class LCA may be useful in creating balanced grader certification examinations that represent the full spectrum of disease. Additionally, a multiclass LCA could act as a probabilistic gold standard used to train and analyze future convolutional neural network models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.