Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999452›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Feasibility of a Mobile Application for Self and Assisted Reporting of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Self-Testing Results in Tanzania: A Pilot Study.

Hajirani M Msuya, Ali M Ali, Mwifadhi Mrisho, Omar N Lweno, Silas G Temu, Ibrahim Msuya, Frank Kalabamu, Florence A Milando, Mohammed Rashid, Ali H Said and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Hajirani M MsuyaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ali M AliIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mwifadhi MrishoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Omar N LwenoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Silas G TemuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ibrahim MsuyaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Frank KalabamuIndependent Researcher, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Florence A MilandoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mohammed RashidIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ali H SaidIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anneth M TumboIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Said A JongoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kamaka R KassimIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Gumi AbdallahIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hussein MbarakIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hassan A MbarakIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hassan T BerengeIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Prosper MshanaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Khamis AwadhIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Selemani MmbagaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tunu NdanziIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Gloria D NyaulingoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lathma IddyNational Bureau of Statistics, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Shraddha BajariaIndependent Researcher, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kekeletso KaoFoundation for Innovation and New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Grace W MwangokaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Salim AbdullaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Abdallah MkopiIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical impediment to efficient outbreak response is the availability of timely and complete data on cases and their linkage to care. To inform solutions to this issue, this study investigated the utility of self-testers reporting their coronavirus disease 2019 results using a mobile health platform. Our study has demonstrated that the mobile health platform is feasible; it achieved a 74.5% reporting rate, indicating a strong likelihood of data entry into the unstructured supplementary service data platform. Support from community health workers (CHWs) and healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, contributed to this success, especially among users with limited digital literacy. Specifically, 44.9% of self-test results were submitted by study participants themselves, 24.7% were submitted with the assistance of healthcare professionals, and 30.4% were submitted with the assistance of CHWs. The platform broadens the population base by increasing access and equity, allowing participation even among users without smartphones. Additionally, it integrates rapid antigen diagnostic tests with digital reporting, simplifying data processing and enabling standardized screening, real-time data capture, and effective patient follow-up. This technology also lays a foundation for pandemic preparedness in low- and middle-income countries by demonstrating the feasibility of fully integrating response loops for disease management and interventions. Future response loops could leverage artificial intelligence, machine learning, and integration with existing health surveillance systems, directly benefiting users through enhanced support.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingMobile ApplicationsSelf-TestingAdultCommunity Health WorkersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2Tanzania

Identifiers

PMID39999452
PMCPMC12139562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.