ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
Development of a Lateral Longitudinal Arch Evaluation Method for the Foot Using Ultrasonography: Validation With Radiography and Verification of Intrarater and Interrater Reliability.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cuboid height measured using ultrasound is related to sex and dorsal arch height.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe lateral longitudinal arch (LLA) is an essential structure of the foot. However, LLA evaluation methods remain underexplored compared to those of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). This study sought to develop a method for measuring the cuboid height, the keystone of the LLA, using ultrasonography and to verify its correlation with radiography, as well as intrarater and interrater reliability.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 21 university students (14 males and seven females). The cuboid height was measured using radiography and ultrasonography. The validity of ultrasonographic measurements was assessed through correlation with radiographic measurements and Bland-Altman analysis. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
resultsA strong correlation was observed between cuboid heights measured using radiography and ultrasonography (r = 0.98, p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a fixed bias of -0.71 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.96 to -0.46 mm). Intrarater and interrater reliability for ultrasonographic measurements were almost perfect, with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively.
conclusionsCuboid height measurements using ultrasonography demonstrated high validity and reliability. This method offers a noninvasive and cost-effective alternative to radiography, with potential clinical applications in the evaluation of LLA and related conditions such as cuboid syndrome and lateral foot injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.