ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing regional competitiveness in Peru: An approach using nonlinear machine learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenges of measuring regional competitiveness using traditional methods, due to the inherent complexity and non-linearity of its determinants'. The development of new Machine Learning (ML) models allows the creation of predictive models capable of handling this type of data, providing actionable insights. The objective of the study was to develop and test the use of non-linear Machine Learning models to measure the regional competitiveness in Peru, at the sub-national level. The research uses the ODD (Overview, Design Concepts, and Details) protocol to ensure a transparent and replicable methodology. The impact of ML on the Peruvian Regional Competitiveness Index (IRCI) is examined across 25 regions from 2016 to 2023, focusing on five key pillars: economy, government, infrastructure, businesses, and people. A suitability index (IoI) was developed to assess how well the pillar components align with ML. Data provided by CENTRUM PUCP was subjected to exploratory data analysis (EDA) to address variability among pillar scores and their effects on competitiveness. Six nonlinear machine learning models (Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Neural Networks, and Decision Trees) were applied, and the machine learning models with the highest predictive accuracy were Gradient Boosting and Random Forest. Performance metrics include MSE values of 1.1399 and 1.3469, RMSE values of 1.0677 and 1.1606, and R2 values of 0.9768 and 0.9729, respectively. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of machine learning in analyzing the complexity of regional competitiveness data, identifying influential variables, and reducing score distortions. The findings provide a data-driven framework for policymakers to improve regional competitiveness, which promotes academic knowledge and practical applications for sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.