Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999124›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: A three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Niklas Walther, Robert Schultz-Heienbrok, Heino Staß, Victor M Corman, Nils C Gassen, Marcel A Müller, Christian Drosten, Martin Witzenrath, Hweeling Lee, Maximilian G Posch

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04644705 (A 3-part Study to Investigate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Niclosamide Solution as a Treatment Option for COVID-19 in Combination With Camostat), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04644705 phase1completednot on this map

A 3-part Study to Investigate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Niclosamide Solution as a Treatment Option for COVID-19 in Combination With Camostat

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharité Research Organisation GmbHRan2020 to 2021Enrolled28ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsNiclosamide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond the target: implications of Wnt pathway inhibitors on bone health.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Repurposing niclosamide to mitigate inflammaging: a review of multi-target mechanisms in cellular senescence and age-related decline.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niklas WaltherCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-5835
Robert Schultz-HeienbrokCharité Research Organisation GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Heino StaßBayer AG, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Wuppertal, Germany.
Victor M CormanInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nils C GassenInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marcel A MüllerInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian DrostenInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin WitzenrathDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hweeling LeeCharité Research Organisation GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Maximilian G PoschCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimNiclosamide is an established anthelmintic substance and a promising candidate for treating cancer, viral infections, and other diseases. However, its solubility in aqueous media is low, and the systemic bioavailability of the commercially available chewing tablet is poor, limiting the use of niclosamide for systemic treatment. A liquid oral formulation using polyethylene glycol 400 was developed and investigated in healthy volunteers to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in comparison to the marketed tablet. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04644705).

methodsThe study consisted of three parts: Part A was a double-blind placebo-controlled single ascending dose trial in three dose groups (200, 600, and 1600 mg) with four participants receiving either the investigational niclosamide formulation or placebo (3:1) under fasted and/or fed conditions. Part B was a crossover study comparing 1600 mg investigational niclosamide solution with the marketed 2000 mg chewing tablet in four healthy volunteers. Part C was a double-blind placebo-controlled multiple-dose trial comparing 1200 mg and 1600 mg (verum: placebo 4:2) in two dose groups with six subjects each, who received daily doses for seven days.

resultsNo serious or severe adverse events occurred. The most frequent adverse events were mild to moderate gastrointestinal reactions. There was also no apparent dependence between drug exposure levels (AUC, Cmax) and the severity and incidence of adverse events detectable. A relevant food effect was observed with a mean AUClast about 2-fold higher in fed condition compared to fasted condition. In Part B, dose-normalized Cmax and AUClast were similar for niclosamide solution and tablet. Absorption of niclosamide solution was highly variable. Some individuals showed high absorption (Cmax > 2µg/ml) whereas others did absorb only marginally. Importantly, there was no dose linearity in the range of 200 mg - 1600 mg. No signs of relevant systemic drug accumulation after multiple administrations were observed.

conclusionOverall safety and tolerability observed in healthy subjects were benign. This is also true for individuals with high absorption (Cmax > 2µg/ml), encouraging further research into niclosamide as a potential therapeutic agent. Galenic optimization, however, will remain challenging as evident from the observed exposure variability and non-linear PK. Non-linearity, if confirmed by additional data, might make niclosamide more suitable for multi-dose rather than high single dose regimens. The observed food effect should also be considered when further investigating systemic niclosamide exposures.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04644705.

Indexed as

NiclosamideAdministration, OralAdultArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedTabletsYoung AdultNiclosamideTablets

Identifiers

PMID39999124
PMCPMC11856320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.