ArticlePloS one2025
A life course study of genetic and environmental influences on sustainable working life.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetics plays a role in short- and long-term sustainable working life (i.e., not having interruptions due to sickness absences (SA), disability pensions (DP), or unemployment), but the life course effects are not known. Thus, we aimed to investigate the age-specific genetic and environmental influences on sustainable working life from young adulthood until old-age pension. We used classical twin modeling based on the genetic relatedness of mono- and dizygotic twins in a longitudinal design. The final sample (n = 49 372) of Swedish same-sex twins with known zygosity born between 1929 and 1990 (52.8% women) with detailed national register data of employment, SA, DP, unemployment, old-age pension, emigration, and death. Genetic influences for sustainable working life were 54% at ages 18-27 years, 59% at 28-37 years, 37% at 38-47 years, 69% at 48-57 years, and 34% at 58-65 years. We observed genetic influences transferred from 18-27 years to 28-37 years and to 38-47 years explaining 28% and 17% of the variance, respectively, from 28-37 years to 38-47 years 60%, and from 48-57 years to 58-65 years 47%. Unique environmental influences were 57-72% in five age groups. Age group-specific common environment explained 63% of the variance for 18-27 years, 27% for 28-37 years, 12% for 48-57 years, and 25% for 58-65 years (none for 38-47 years). From age 48-57 years, the common environment explained 24% of the variance among those aged 58-67. To conclude, stability and change in genetic effects are important for a sustainable working life across the life course. The unique environmental effects were important for the middle age groups between 28 and 57 years. Thus, society and workplaces should support health and well-being to promote a sustainable working life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.