Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999095›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Understanding the vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 in Benin.

Daleb Abdoulaye Alfa, Jean-Yves Le Hesran, Inès Boko, Anani Agossou, Aurore Atchadé, Marc Fiogbé, Emmanuel Yovo, Sandrine Hounsa, Achille Massougbodji, Gilles Cottrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daleb Abdoulaye AlfaInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-3265
Jean-Yves Le HesranInstitut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD), MERIT Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Inès BokoInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Anani AgossouInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Aurore AtchadéInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Marc FiogbéInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Emmanuel YovoInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Sandrine HounsaInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8554-1102
Achille MassougbodjiInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin/ IRCB, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Gilles CottrellInstitut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD), MERIT Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-8963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 have been set up in all countries. The aim was to reach a sufficient vaccination threshold to ensure herd immunity. In Benin, the objective was to achieve 60% coverage. However, coverage was only 35% in May 2022. People were reluctant to be vaccinated. We had set up a population-based study to investigate these barriers to vaccination. Our approach was qualitative (80 semi-structured interviews with vaccinated and non-vaccinated people) and quantitative (179 questionnaires with CHWs (Community Health Workers) in urban and rural areas. To analyse the qualitative data, thematic sorting was carried out, while the statistical analysis of the data was carried out using SPSS and Excel software. Perceptions and concerns about COVID-19 revealed widespread mistrust of the disease and vaccination. Part of the population doubted the existence or seriousness of the disease, with over 70% of CHWs reporting that people did not perceive the reality of the disease in their daily lives. These doubts were reinforced by the limited impact of the disease and political interpretations of the pandemic, often viewed as a tool for state control. Mistrust of vaccines was even more pronounced, with over 90% of CHWs indicating that people were concerned about the novelty of vaccines and doubts their effectiveness. Rumours circulating on social networks amplified these concerns, fuelling fears about vaccine safety. Fear of stigmatisation, forced isolation and the impossibility of carrying out traditional funeral rituals heightened people's reluctance. The requirement to sign a consent form absolving the state of responsibility for side-effects further deepened these suspicions. Our study confirmed a strong reluctance to vaccinate against COVID-19. It highlighted the critical role of media and social networks and the necessity for authorities to address these factors in communication diseases to ensure efficient disease control.

Identifiers

PMID39999095
PMCPMC11856262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.