ArticlePloS one2025
Visual recognition of honeybee behavior patterns at the hive entrance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Buzzing with Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Smart Beehive Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Continuous Non-Invasive Monitoring of Hive Entrance Activity Reveals Honey Bee Colony Dynamics.Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel method for automatically recognizing honeybee behavior patterns at the hive entrance, significantly contributing to beekeeping and hive management. Utilizing advanced YOLOv8 models for detection and segmentation, our approach analyzes various aspects of bee behavior, including location, direction, path trajectory, and movement speed within a designated area on the hive's landing board. The system effectively detects multiple bee activities such as foraging, fanning, washboarding, and defense, achieving a mean detection accuracy of 98% and operating at speeds of up to 36 fps, surpassing state-of-the-art methods in both speed and accuracy. Key contributions include the development of a comprehensive dataset with 7200 frames from eight beehives, the introduction of the first known research focused on recognizing bee behavior patterns through visual analysis at the hive entrance, and a comparative evaluation of various object detection and tracking algorithms tailored for bee detection and behavior recognition. Our findings indicate that this method enhances monitoring capabilities for beekeepers while reducing the need for manual inspections, thereby minimizing disturbances to the bees. By analyzing spatial trajectories and occurrence density maps, the proposed framework provides robust identification of overlapping behaviors, facilitating timely interventions when necessary. This work lays the groundwork for future automated monitoring systems aimed at improving hive health and productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.