Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999052›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Self-rehabilitation strategy for rural community-dwelling stroke survivors in a lower-middle income country: a modified Delphi study.

Rabiu Ibrahim, Conran Joseph, Aimée Stewart, Isa Usman Lawal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07208422 (Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Task-Specific Self-Rehabilitation Training), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07208422 nacompletednot on this map

Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Task-Specific Self-Rehabilitation Training (TASSRET) for Improving Functional Mobility in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Low-Resource Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Assembly ClinicRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsStroke, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Stroke Ischemic, Hemiparesis After StrokeArmsVideo-based Task-specific Training, Manual-based Task-specific Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rabiu IbrahimDirectorate of Health Services, Department of Hospital Services, Physiotherapy Division, National Assembly Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3560-0159
Conran JosephDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Aimée StewartDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Isa Usman LawalDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than half of stroke survivors in lower-middle income countries lack access to stroke rehabilitation services. The promotion of self-rehabilitation could be promising for addressing stroke rehabilitation inadequacies in lower-middle income countries. Self-rehabilitation interventions are more readily acceptable to community-dwelling stroke survivors, and therefore, have the potential to boost the successful realization of the Sustainable Development Goals and other WHO rehabilitation goals. We report a consensus-building process that sought to identify which task trainings are relevant to include in a task-specific self-rehabilitation strategy for rural community-dwelling stroke survivors.

methodsAn iterative two-stage mixed-method consensus-building approach was used: (1) focus group discussions (n =  5) with rural community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors were conducted to explore personal life experiences in performing daily activities, and the results were used to develop a list of candidate task trainings that could be included in a task-specific self-rehabilitation intervention model for improving functional ability of survivors; (2) a three-round Delphi exercise with a panel of stroke rehabilitation experts to establish consensus on the importance/relevance of the developed task trainings. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point where the proportion of items given a rating of 3 (quite relevant) or 4 (highly relevant) by expert panellists is ≥  0.8. Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the level of agreement among the expert panellists.

resultsA list of 74 task trainings was generated from the results of the focus group discussions involving 29 chronic stroke survivors. The tasks were classified as follows: training for the upper extremity (37); lower extremity training (21); trunk training (7); and balance training (9). A panel of 13 stroke rehabilitation experts reviewed these task trainings using the Delphi method and consensus was reached on keeping 28 task trainings in the first round (Kendall's W =  0.252, p <  0.001) and an additional 7 in the second round (Kendall's W =  0.409, p <  0.001). In the study team's analysis of open text responses, several areas of debate were identified and some task trainings were modified. The exercise yielded 49 task trainings (66% of 74) on which there was consensus (the mean proportion of items given a rating of 3 or 4 by panellists was 0.93; Kendall's W =  0.291, p <  0.001) to keep 3 task training groups relating to: upper extremity (27), lower extremity/balance (8), trunk strength (4) as well as warm up exercises (10).

conclusionThe study provides a consensus-based view of the features of a task-specific self-rehabilitation training strategy to improve outcomes following a stroke. This self-rehabilitation training strategy can be used as an intervention approach to augment and promote stroke rehabilitation among rural community-dwelling stroke survivors, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAgedDelphi TechniqueDeveloping CountriesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID39999052
PMCPMC11856556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.