Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999026›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Establishing Syndromic Surveillance of Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke: Registry Study Based on Routine Data From German Emergency Departments.

Madlen Schranz, Mirjam Rupprecht, Annette Aigner, Leo Benning, Carmen Schlump, Nesrine Charfeddine, Michaela Diercke, Linus Grabenhenrich, Alexander Ullrich, Hannelore Neuhauser and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Madlen SchranzDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2426-5770
Mirjam RupprechtDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-5497-5276
Annette AignerInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universiät Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-8921
Leo BenningUniversity Emergency Department, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-9702
Carmen SchlumpDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-2955-7105
Nesrine CharfeddineDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-4597-4558
Michaela DierckeDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-1813
Linus GrabenhenrichDepartment for Method Development, Research Infrastructure and Information Technology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-6625
Alexander UllrichDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4894-6124
Hannelore NeuhauserDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-6221
Birga MaierDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-5682-4662
AKTIN Research Group
Felix Patricius Hans *University Emergency Department, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-7624
Sabine Blaschke *Emergency Department, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-7554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) routine data offer a unique opportunity for syndromic surveillance of communicable and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). In 2020, the Robert Koch Institute established a syndromic surveillance system using ED data from the AKTIN registry. The system provides daily insights into ED utilization for infectious diseases. Adding NCD indicators to the surveillance is of great public health importance, especially during acute events, where timely monitoring enables targeted public health responses and communication. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate syndrome definitions for the NCD indicators of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke (STR). Methods: First, syndrome definitions were developed with clinical experts combining ED diagnosis, chief complaints, diagnostic certainty, and discharge information. Then, using the multicenter retrospective routine ED data provided by the AKTIN registry, we conducted internal validation by linking ED cases fulfilling the syndrome definition with the hospital discharge diagnoses and calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Lastly, external validation comprised the comparison of the ED cases fulfilling the syndrome definition with the federal German hospital diagnosis statistic. Ratios comparing the relative number of cases for all syndrome definitions were calculated and stratified by age and sex. Results: We analyzed data from 9 EDs, totaling 704,797 attendances from January 1, 2019, to March 5, 2021. Syndrome definitions were based on ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision-German Modification) diagnoses, chief complaints, and discharge information. We identified 4.3% of all cases as ACS, 0.6% as MI, and 3.2% as STR. Patients with ACS and MI were more likely to be male (58.3% and 64.7%), compared to the overall attendances (52.7%). For all syndrome definitions, the prevalence was higher in the older age groups (60-79 years and >80 years), and the highest proportions of cases were assigned an urgency level (3=urgent or 2=very urgent). The internal validation showed accuracy and specificity levels above 96% for all syndrome definitions. The sensitivity was 85.3% for ACS, 56.6% for MI, and 80.5% for STR. The external validation showed high levels of correspondence between the ED data and the German hospital statistics, with most ratios ranging around 1, indicating congruence, particularly in older age groups. The highest differences were noted in younger age groups, with the highest ratios in women aged between 20 and 39 years (4.57 for MI and 4.17 for ACS). Conclusions: We developed NCD indicators for ACS, MI, and STR that showed high levels of internal and external validity. The integration of these indicators into the syndromic surveillance system for EDs could enable daily monitoring of NCD patterns and trends to enhance timely public health surveillance in Germany.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeEmergency Service, HospitalMyocardial InfarctionPopulation SurveillanceStrokeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective Studiesaccuracyacute coronary syndromediagnosisemergency departmentemergency medicineGermanyhealth surveillancemyocardial infarctionpublic healthpublic health surveillanceroutine dataroutinely collected health datastrokesyndromesyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID39999026
PMCPMC11878330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.