ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
NPM: latent batch effects correction of omics data by nearest-pair matching.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-aware multi-property antibody predictor: a novel framework integrating text and protein language models.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Highly effective batch effect correction method for RNA-seq count data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationBatch effects (BEs) are a predominant source of noise in omics data and often mask real biological signals. BEs remain common in existing datasets. Current methods for BE correction mostly rely on specific assumptions or complex models, and may not detect and adjust BEs adequately, impacting downstream analysis and discovery power. To address these challenges we developed NPM, a nearest-neighbor matching-based method that adjusts BEs and may outperform other methods in a wide range of datasets.
resultsWe assessed distinct metrics and graphical readouts, and compared our method to commonly used BE correction methods. NPM demonstrates the ability in correcting for BEs, while preserving biological differences. It may outperform other methods based on multiple metrics. Altogether, NPM proves to be a valuable BE correction approach to maximize discovery in biomedical research, with applicability in clinical research where latent BEs are often dominant. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: NPM is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/bigomics/NPM) and on Omics Playground (https://bigomics.ch/omics-playground). Computer codes for analyses are available at (https://github.com/bigomics/NPM). The datasets underlying this article are the following: GSE120099, GSE82177, GSE162760, GSE171343, GSE153380, GSE163214, GSE182440, GSE163857, GSE117970, GSE173078, and GSE10846. All these datasets are publicly available and can be freely accessed on the Gene Expression Omnibus repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.