Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998966›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025

Docking guidance with experimental ligand structural density improves docking pose prediction and virtual screening performance.

Althea T Hansel-Harris, Andreas F Tillack, Diogo Santos-Martins, Matthew Holcomb, Stefano Forli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Althea T Hansel-HarrisDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Andreas F TillackDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Diogo Santos-MartinsDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Matthew HolcombDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Stefano ForliDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-7111

Funding

AutoDock Suite: Next Generation Environment for Drug DesignR01GM069832 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI FORLI, STEFANO · 2004 to 2025
$10.9M
Resource for Structure-based Computational Drug Discovery and Design (RSD3)R24GM145962 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI Stefano Forli · 2022 to 2026
$5.7M
UC San Diego Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM154642 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Neil C Chi, Mary Kathleen Lewinski · 2025 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM069832NIGMS NIH HHS GM145962NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069832NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM145962NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM154642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in structural biology have led to the publication of a wealth of high-resolution x-ray crystallography (XRC) and cryo-EM macromolecule structures, including many complexes with small molecules of interest for drug design. While it is common to incorporate information from the atomic coordinates of these complexes into docking (e.g., pharmacophore models or scaffold hopping), there are limited methods to directly leverage the underlying density information. This is desirable because it does not rely on the determination of relevant coordinates, which may require expert intervention, but instead interprets all density as indicative of regions to which a ligand may be bound. To do so, we have developed CryoXKit, a tool to incorporate experimental densities from either cryo-EM or XRC as a biasing potential on heavy atoms during docking. Using this structural density guidance with AutoDock-GPU, we found significant improvements in re-docking and cross-docking, important pose prediction tasks, compared with the unmodified AutoDock4 force field. Failures in cross-docking tasks are additionally reflective of changes in the positioning of pharmacophores in the site, suggesting it is a fundamental limitation of transferring information between complexes. We additionally found, against a set of targets selected from the LIT-PCBA dataset, that rescoring of these improved poses leads to better discriminatory power in virtual screenings for selected targets. Overall, CryoXKit provides a user-friendly method for improving docking performance with experimental data while requiring no a priori pharmacophore definition and at virtually no computational expense. Map-modification code available at: https://github.com/forlilab/CryoXKit.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationProteinsSoftwareCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayDrug DesignLigandsProtein ConformationLigandsProteinsautodockdockingdrug discoveryvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID39998966
PMCPMC11854350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.