ReviewPharmacogenomics2024
Pharmacogenomics and response to lithium in bipolar disorder.
Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical value of pharmacogenomics in the pharmacotherapy of common psychiatric disorders: a macroscopic analysis based on real-world data.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Lithium Therapeutic Functions: An Update on Pharmacokinetics, Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Action, Toxicity, and Side Effects.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota signatures associated with lithium treatment and clinical response in patients with bipolar disorder.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- At 75 Years, Is Lithium the Gold Standard in Bipolar Disorder?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe present review explores the existing evidence on pharmacogenomic tests for prediction of lithium response in the treatment of bipolar disorder. We focused our research article on reports describing findings from genome-wide association studies, polygenic risk scores, and gene expression analyses associated with lithium response.
methodsWe conducted a non-systematic review of studies from PubMed/Medline by using terms such as "pharmacogenomics," "GWAS," "gene expression," and "lithium response." Inclusion criteria focused on original research involving human subjects and assessing lithium response outcomes as well as in vitro studies. An extensive pearl-growing strategy was employed to further enlarge the scope of the piece by capitalizing on the knowledge of study authors on the subject.
resultsThe observed results, albeit promising, remain preliminary in terms of clinical relevance. Machine learning combining genetic and clinical data appears associated with moderate success in predicting lithium responsiveness. Gene expression studies and genome-wide association studies have helped identify possible targets of lithium and have the potential to support target-specific drug research.
conclusionsPharmacogenomics may support further discoveries in precision medicine further enlarging our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of lithium for its efficacy. However, clinical applications currently appear out of reach in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.