Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2025
A multicenter prospective clinical trial reveals cell-free DNA methylation markers for early esophageal cancer.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Multiplatform Discovery of Methylation Markers Enables Non-Invasive Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Esophageal cancer: from pathogenesis to precision therapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Methylation entropy as a novel dimension in liquid biopsy: enhanced multimodal framework for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin classification.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Advances in epigenetic therapy for esophageal cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy, multi-cancer early detection, and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in cancer screening from a technological and immunological perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Nonendoscopic Biomarkers for Precision Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer: Evidence, Risk Stratification and Translational Challenges.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Blood-based tumor biomarkers: integrating biological layers and analytical strategies for precision cancer detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics analysis identifiesTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- Environmental Xenobiotics and Epigenetic Modifications: Implications for Human Health and Disease.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- A diagnostic model for non-invasive urothelial cancer early detection based on methylation of urinary tumor DNA.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- DNA methylation in esophageal cancer: technological advances and early detection clinical applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDCurrent methods for detecting esophageal cancer (EC) are generally invasive or exhibit limited sensitivity and specificity, especially for the identification of early-stage tumors.METHODSWe identified potential methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from multiple genomic regions in a discovery cohort, and a diagnostic model was developed and verified in a model-verification cohort of 297 participants. The accuracy of the MDM panel was validated in a multicenter, prospective cohort (n = 1,429). The clinical performance of identified MDMs were compared with current tumor-associated protein markers.RESULTSFrom 31 significant differentially methylated EC-associated regions identified in the marker discovery, we trained and validated a 3-MDM diagnostic model that could discriminate among patients with EC and volunteers without EC in a multicenter clinical prospective cohort with a sensitivity of 85.5% and a specificity of 95.3%. This panel showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing early-stage tumors, with sensitivities of 56% for stage 0 and 77% for stage I, compared with the performance of current biochemical markers. In population with high risk for EC, the sensitivity and specificity were 85.68% and 93.61%, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe assessment of tumor-associated methylation status in blood samples can facilitate noninvasive and reliable diagnosis of early-stage EC, which warrants further development to expand screening and reduce mortality rates.TRIAL REGISTRATIONChiCTR2400083525.FUNDINGScience and technology funds of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, Administrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park. Project number: Z201100005420007.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.