Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998827›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

A Multisite Demonstration of Shared Access to Older Adults' Patient Portals.

Kelly T Gleason, Catherine M DesRoches, Mingche M J Wu, Danielle Peereboom, Vadim Dukhanin, Timothy W Farrell, Matthew J Gonzales, Saloni Sharma, Supriya G Mohile, Sara Epstein and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kelly T GleasonJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Catherine M DesRochesOpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mingche M J WuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Danielle PeereboomDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Vadim DukhaninDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Timothy W FarrellDivision of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, and the Center on Aging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Matthew J GonzalesInstitute for Human Caring, Providence, Renton, Washington.
Saloni SharmaWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Supriya G MohileWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Sara EpsteinInstitute for Human Caring, Providence, Renton, Washington.
Mark A SupianoDivision of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, and the Center on Aging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Marianne C ParshleyProvidence Medical Group, Portland, Oregon.
David L RothDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer L WolffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shared Access Project Team

Funding

A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The patient portal has a growing role in health care. Many health systems have implemented shared access functionality in which patients may register a care partner with unique identity credentials to access their portal. Uptake of shared access has been limited. Objective: To examine the outcomes of a multisite demonstration involving organizational strategies associated with registration and use of patient portal shared access. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted in diverse sites within 3 health systems in the US: (1) geriatric oncology, (2) geriatric medicine, and (3) primary care. Patients aged 65 years or older with 1 or more visits during the 12-month demonstration period (July 1, 2022, through July 1, 2023, for sites 1 and 2; site 3 was delayed 3 months) and care partners who used the portal accounts of patients meeting these criteria were included. The 6-month postdemonstration period (August 1, 2023, through January 1, 2024) was compared with the 6-month predemonstration period (January 1 through June 1, 2022). Exposures: Organizational strategies (brochures, webpages, tip sheets, and implementation toolkits created using a human-centered design) to encourage shared access registration and use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Portal registration and use (logins, laboratory results viewed, clinical notes viewed, visits scheduled) by type of access (patient and care partner) from electronic health record data were examined. Patient- and care partner-reported awareness and use of shared access were measured using a postdemonstration survey. Results: A total of 16 005 patients from the 3 sites met the inclusion criteria (84.8% younger than 85 years and 61.5% women). Most patients had an activated portal account (91.0%) and logged in at least once (84.8%) during the 24 months spanning the demonstration and pre- and postdemonstration periods. New portal registrations were stable, but nonsignificant for shared access (110 of 14 758 [0.7%] vs 91 of 14 016 [0.6%]) and significantly decreased for patient access (677 of 3158 [21.5%] vs 225 of 1520 [13.2%]). Use of shared access before vs after the demonstration increased for number of logins (mean [SD], 5.9 [11.4] vs 6.8 [14.1]), laboratory results viewed (mean [SD], 0.7 [2.7] vs 1.1 [3.7]), clinical notes viewed (mean [SD], 0.2 [1.1] vs 0.6 [3.2]), and visits scheduled (mean [SD], 0.8 [10.8] vs 1.0 [5.4]). Of the 91 care partners reporting portal use in the postdemonstration survey, 48 (52.7%) indicated primarily using patient credentials and 31 (34.1%) indicated primarily using their own credentials. Less than one-half of patients (721 of 1664 [43.3%]) stated being aware of shared access. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show no association of the multisite demonstration with increased new registrations for shared access and only modest increases in portal use among care partners of older adults. As portal use expands to encompass legal documentation, medical decision-making, and patient education, policies to support proper use of identity credentials are needed.

Indexed as

Patient PortalsAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePatient Access to RecordsPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39998827
PMCPMC11862967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.