ArticleJAMA network open2025
A Multisite Demonstration of Shared Access to Older Adults' Patient Portals.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in Telehealth Use and Changes in Associated Disparities: 2022-2024 HINTS.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Few Caregivers of Older Adults With Dementia Have Shared Access to Their Care Recipients' Electronic Health Record Portal.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026Article
- Equipping Health Systems to Meet Older Adults' Care Needs: A Novel Age-Friendly Patient and Family Advisory Council.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Family Caregiver Experiences Coordinating Care of Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Solutions for Increased Adoption of Patient Portal Shared Access: A Human-Centered Design Approach Using the Double Diamond Model.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Users' perspectives on a demonstration to increase shared access to older adults' patient portals.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The patient portal has a growing role in health care. Many health systems have implemented shared access functionality in which patients may register a care partner with unique identity credentials to access their portal. Uptake of shared access has been limited. Objective: To examine the outcomes of a multisite demonstration involving organizational strategies associated with registration and use of patient portal shared access. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted in diverse sites within 3 health systems in the US: (1) geriatric oncology, (2) geriatric medicine, and (3) primary care. Patients aged 65 years or older with 1 or more visits during the 12-month demonstration period (July 1, 2022, through July 1, 2023, for sites 1 and 2; site 3 was delayed 3 months) and care partners who used the portal accounts of patients meeting these criteria were included. The 6-month postdemonstration period (August 1, 2023, through January 1, 2024) was compared with the 6-month predemonstration period (January 1 through June 1, 2022). Exposures: Organizational strategies (brochures, webpages, tip sheets, and implementation toolkits created using a human-centered design) to encourage shared access registration and use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Portal registration and use (logins, laboratory results viewed, clinical notes viewed, visits scheduled) by type of access (patient and care partner) from electronic health record data were examined. Patient- and care partner-reported awareness and use of shared access were measured using a postdemonstration survey. Results: A total of 16 005 patients from the 3 sites met the inclusion criteria (84.8% younger than 85 years and 61.5% women). Most patients had an activated portal account (91.0%) and logged in at least once (84.8%) during the 24 months spanning the demonstration and pre- and postdemonstration periods. New portal registrations were stable, but nonsignificant for shared access (110 of 14 758 [0.7%] vs 91 of 14 016 [0.6%]) and significantly decreased for patient access (677 of 3158 [21.5%] vs 225 of 1520 [13.2%]). Use of shared access before vs after the demonstration increased for number of logins (mean [SD], 5.9 [11.4] vs 6.8 [14.1]), laboratory results viewed (mean [SD], 0.7 [2.7] vs 1.1 [3.7]), clinical notes viewed (mean [SD], 0.2 [1.1] vs 0.6 [3.2]), and visits scheduled (mean [SD], 0.8 [10.8] vs 1.0 [5.4]). Of the 91 care partners reporting portal use in the postdemonstration survey, 48 (52.7%) indicated primarily using patient credentials and 31 (34.1%) indicated primarily using their own credentials. Less than one-half of patients (721 of 1664 [43.3%]) stated being aware of shared access. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show no association of the multisite demonstration with increased new registrations for shared access and only modest increases in portal use among care partners of older adults. As portal use expands to encompass legal documentation, medical decision-making, and patient education, policies to support proper use of identity credentials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.