ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Tumoral Melanosis: A Case Series of a Rare Clinical Entity.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Shadows of disappearance: the enigma of completely regressed cutaneous melanoma revealed by lymph node metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumoral melanosis (TM) is a rare entity thought to result from the complete regression of melanoma. Clinically, TM resembles malignant melanocytic lesions, presenting as hyperpigmented flat or papulonodular lesions. Histologically, TM lacks melanocytes, instead showing inflammation, fibrosis, and melanophages. Diagnosing melanoma without melanocytes is challenging, and TM may also represent other regressed benign or malignant pigmented lesions. This study retrospectively analyzed 12 TM cases focusing on the clinical course, management, and potential for malignancy. Among the cases, 50% were associated with advanced or metastatic melanoma, supporting TM's potential as a regressed melanoma. Conversely, in 50% of cases, TM occurred without primary or metastatic melanoma, suggesting possible regression of a benign or malignant epithelial lesion such as pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or seborrheic keratosis (SK) or confinement of melanoma by the immune system. Management included surgical excision and follow-up similar to that of melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was selectively performed based on clinical suspicion and multidisciplinary team discussions. In conclusion, TM should be considered potentially regressed melanoma, especially in patients with high disease burden, and the possibility of derivation from high-grade melanomas must always be considered. Given the inability to distinguish TM from completely regressed melanoma, clinicians must remain vigilant and suspect this origin during staging and follow-up. Comprehensive management and close monitoring are crucial to address TM's clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.