ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Non-lead flexible composite shields efficiency in decreasing dose in chest CT scan imaging.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tungsten-bismuth shielding sheets for radiation safety in fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy: a phantom study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lead-based radiation shielding used usually in radiology departments is being replaced by non-lead shields due to concerns over toxicity, high weight, and the impossibility of applying it in the imaging field. New studies refer to the use of nanomaterials and lightweight polymer-based composites as an alternative that can solve the problems caused by lead shields. The study aims to develop a flexible composite shield for CT scan imaging and examine its effectiveness in reducing radiation exposure. This study involved the construction of 1 mm thick composite shields used in chest CT scan imaging. The first type consisted of 10% bismuth oxide, the second type consisted of 10% tungsten, the third type consisted of 5% bismuth oxide and 5% tungsten, and 90% of the rest of the structure of all shields was silicone. This study examined the morphological test, tensile strength test, attenuation efficiency, and image quality assessment of these shields. The radiation transmission coefficient for 10% bismuth, 10% tungsten and 5% bismuth-5%tungsten shields was obtained as 0.86, 0.80, and 0.83, respectively. Also, the noise increasing percentage for mentioned shields were 6, 4, and 6%, respectively, compared to the case without a shield. The study found that the 10% tungsten-90% silicone shield is the most effective in reducing radiation exposure due to its K-edge and attenuation coefficients. According to the noise assessment, using these shields does not significantly affect the quality of images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.