Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998795›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Non-lead flexible composite shields efficiency in decreasing dose in chest CT scan imaging.

Mahdi Mansoori Kia, Soheila Refahi, Parinaz Mehnati, Reza Malekzadeh, Aarefeh Jafarzadeh Kohneloo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahdi Mansoori KiaDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Soheila RefahiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Parinaz MehnatiMedical Radiation Sciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Parinazmehnati8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-6984
Reza MalekzadehDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Aarefeh Jafarzadeh KohnelooDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead-based radiation shielding used usually in radiology departments is being replaced by non-lead shields due to concerns over toxicity, high weight, and the impossibility of applying it in the imaging field. New studies refer to the use of nanomaterials and lightweight polymer-based composites as an alternative that can solve the problems caused by lead shields. The study aims to develop a flexible composite shield for CT scan imaging and examine its effectiveness in reducing radiation exposure. This study involved the construction of 1 mm thick composite shields used in chest CT scan imaging. The first type consisted of 10% bismuth oxide, the second type consisted of 10% tungsten, the third type consisted of 5% bismuth oxide and 5% tungsten, and 90% of the rest of the structure of all shields was silicone. This study examined the morphological test, tensile strength test, attenuation efficiency, and image quality assessment of these shields. The radiation transmission coefficient for 10% bismuth, 10% tungsten and 5% bismuth-5%tungsten shields was obtained as 0.86, 0.80, and 0.83, respectively. Also, the noise increasing percentage for mentioned shields were 6, 4, and 6%, respectively, compared to the case without a shield. The study found that the 10% tungsten-90% silicone shield is the most effective in reducing radiation exposure due to its K-edge and attenuation coefficients. According to the noise assessment, using these shields does not significantly affect the quality of images.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageRadiation ProtectionRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedBismuthHumansTensile StrengthTungstenBismuthbismuth oxideTungstenAttenuation coefficientBismuthRadiation shieldSiliconeTungsten

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.