Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998726›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025

A randomized controlled trial of the outcomes of Arista™ hemostatic agent in robotic ventral hernia repair.

Courtney Janowski, Tiffany Nguyen, Carlos Balthazar da Silveira, Snigdha Gulati, Vikram Deka, Thomas Gillespie, Conrad Ballecer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Courtney JanowskiCreighton University School of Medicine General Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Tiffany NguyenCreighton University School of Medicine General Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Carlos Balthazar da SilveiraDignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA. carlos.balthazardasilveira@commonspirit.org.
Snigdha GulatiDignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Vikram DekaCreighton University School of Medicine General Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Thomas GillespieCreighton University School of Medicine General Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Conrad BallecerCreighton University School of Medicine General Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States, with over 300,000 cases treated annually. Robotic surgery has gained traction for its safety and efficacy in VHR, particularly with techniques such as myofascial release. However, the extensive dissection involved in these procedures may lead to postoperative complications like seromas and hematomas. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Arista™, an FDA-approved hemostatic agent, in reducing these complications during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR involving mesh placement in the retrorectus space. This single-institution single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR at a tertiary referral hernia center. Participants were randomized to receive either 5 g of Arista™ or standard of care intraoperatively, with no hemostat applied in the control group. All patients had drains placed in the retrorectus space. Primary outcomes included drain output on the first postoperative day (POD), total drain output, and duration of drain placement. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), number of drains used, operative time, and length of stay (LOS). This study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). The mean total drain output was significantly higher in the Arista™ group (592.8 ml) compared to the control group (407.9 ml; p = 0.01), with a 39.6% increase noted. However, no significant difference in drain output on the first postoperative day or drain duration was observed. Secondary outcomes revealed no statistically significant differences in EBL, number of drains, operative time, or LOS between the groups. While the application of Arista™ during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR resulted in increased total drain output, it did not significantly affect other postoperative metrics, including LOS and complications. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of Arista™ in specific patient populations and surgical contexts.

Indexed as

HemostaticsHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesHemostaticsHematomaIncisional herniaSeromaVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.