Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998718›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025

Evaluation of Ireland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax (SSBT).

Frank Houghton, Jennifer Moran Stritch, Jeremy Auerbach, Daisy Houghton, Mia Daly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank HoughtonTechnological University of the Shannon (TUS), Moylish, Limerick, Ireland. Frank.Houghton@TUS.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-5255
Jennifer Moran StritchTechnological University of the Shannon (TUS), Moylish, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-0709
Jeremy AuerbachUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-7943
Daisy HoughtonUniversity of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-0829
Mia DalyUniversity of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIreland is experiencing high levels of overweight and obesity. The adverse health impacts of excess weight include cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and dental decay, as well as a host of other conditions. In response, the Irish Government introduced a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax (SSBT) in 2018.

aimsThis research sought to explore the impact of Ireland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.

methodEuromonitor International Ltd data for the years 2010 - 2022 detailing carbonated drinkrelated sugar consumption in Ireland was examined.

resultsA gradual decline in sugar consumption via carbonated soft drinks was evident before the introduction of the SSBT in Ireland. However, in the first full year since the introduction of the SSBT, there was a marked 30.2% reduction in sugar intake via carbonates through retailers and a 19.8% reduction in sugar intake via carbonates via food service venues.

conclusionsThe reduction in sugar intake via carbonates in the aftermath of the introduction of the SSBT was dramatic. However, it is unclear how much of this reduction was caused by industry reformulation of soft drinks and how much by consumers choosing lower-sugar or sugar-free soft beverages. Whatever the precise contribution of either factor, these results suggest that the SSBT has effectively reset national sugar consumption via soft drinks at a lower level.

Indexed as

Carbonated BeveragesSugar-Sweetened BeveragesTaxesHumansIrelandObesityEvaluationIrelandSSBTSugar tax

Identifiers

PMID39998718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.