ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Exploring the optimal parameter settings of a thulium fiber laser during soft tissue resection.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a lack of clinical consensus on the parameter settings of the pulsed-wave thulium fiber laser for soft tissue resection. The aim of this study was to explore the optimal parameter settings of the pulsed-wave thulium fiber laser for soft tissue resection, with a view to providing a reference for future clinical applications. Two different thulium fiber lasers, prototype thulium fiber lasers and Urolase, were used to explore the optimal parameters of thulium fiber laser for soft tissue cutting by evaluating the depth of tissue vaporization and depth of thermal damage in an isolated pig kidney model, and then the optimal parameters of in vitro screening were statistically validated by operation time, coagulation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, smoke level, and depth of thermal damage in an in vivo model using rabbit kidney. In ex vivo animal experiments the depth of tissue vaporization and thermal damage increased with increasing average power, and tissue carbonization occurred at 30 W. In animal use we used 1 J, 25 W for surgery, and there was no statistical difference between the two thulium fiber lasers in terms of surgery time, coagulation time, bleeding, smoke level, and depth of thermal damage. Thulium fiber laser for soft tissue resection is safe and feasible, and we believe that 1 J, 25 W is the optimal laser setting parameter for soft tissue resection, but it needs to be adjusted according to the actual situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.