Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998713›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

In-vitro validation of a new method to assess the clinical accuracy of complete arch impressions.

Moritz Waldecker, Schessler Katherina, Bömicke Wolfgang, Rammelsberg Peter, Rues Stefan

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz WaldeckerDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. moritz.waldecker@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Schessler KatherinaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bömicke WolfgangDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rammelsberg PeterDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rues StefanDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a new method to acquire reference distances. MATERIALS AND

methodsA method to accurately register the intraoral position of precision balls was developed to generate reference values for the in-vivo assessment of impression accuracy and tested in vitro. Therefore, metal occlusal veneers with a special abutment carrying precision balls were provisionally attached to specific positions on the patient's dental arch (anatomical model with PMMA covered metal teeth). To register the precision ball positions, form-congruent counterparts were jointed to the abutments, adhesively fixed to a transfer aid, removed and digitized with a laboratory scanner. First, the distance determination using a transfer aid and a laboratory scanner was validated. Second, the process was tested for an anatomic situation.

resultsWhen measuring distances using a transfer aid and a laboratory scanner, distances could be detected with an accuracy of less than 5 μm. Using the new test setup on the anatomical model, the intraoral scanners more accurately reproduced scan volumes up to one quadrant, with deviations between the actual scan data sets/plaster models and the reference data set of < 52 μm for Primescan, < 82 μm for Omnicam, and < 125 μm for conventional impression. Longer distances tended to be more accurately represented by the conventional impression (Primescan < 304 μm; Omnicam < 328 μm; conventional impression < 164 μm).

conclusionsThe developed method seems suitable for determining the clinical accuracy of conventional and digital complete arch impressions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For determining the clinical accuracy of conventional or digital impressions, reference values are crucial.

Indexed as

Dental ArchDental Impression TechniqueDental Impression MaterialsDental VeneersHumansIn Vitro TechniquesModels, DentalReproducibility of ResultsDental Impression MaterialsDental impression materialsDental impression techniqueDigital impressionIntraoral scanReproducibility of results

Identifiers

PMID39998713
PMCPMC11861410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.