ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
The optimal time and clinical implications of measurable residual disease detection in mantle cell lymphoma.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: What Are the Current Options?European journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in measurable residual disease (MRD) technology have significantly enhanced predictive accuracy for outcomes in various hematologic malignancies, serving as a crucial surrogate endpoint. However, in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), identifying the optimal timing for MRD assessment and understanding the prognostic implications of MRD dynamics remain challenging, primarily due to limited extensive MRD data. Our study encompassed 102 patients with MCL, all presenting with clonal B-cell involvement in bone marrow as determined by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC). MRD evaluations were conducted every two cycles. 75.5% (77/102) achieved MRD negativity during induction therapy. We found the MRD status at the end of four cycles treatment had the best predictive ability for survival (HR = 3.2, C-index = 0.664). 32 of 77 patients (41.6%) had a rapid tumor burden reduction and achieved MRD negativity within two cycles treatment. Notably, this swift shift to MRD negativity was observed more frequently in patients classified as MIPI high-risk. However, this rapid clearance of MRD did not confer any prognostic benefit to these patients. Subgroup analyses revealed that MRD negativity held prognostic value in almost all categories, except for those with blastoid/pleomorphic morphology. MRD assessment serves as a valuable complement to the traditional response evaluation, particularly benefiting for patients attaining partial remission. These findings highlighted the importance of MRD detection during response evaluation of MCL therapy and determined that after four treatment cycles is the best MRD detection timepoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.