ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNormal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome characterized by the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that results in the clinic triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH can be categorized as secondary, idiopathic, or familial. Here, we report a comparison of sporadic to familial types from clinical, radiological, and surgery response aspects as well as a novel gene mutation as a cause of familial NPH.
methodWe analyzed 139 patients evaluated for NPH at our center from 2010 to 2022. Ninety-five patients diagnosed with probable (n = 26) or definite (n = 69) iNPH were included. Clinical, radiological, and gait data were retrospectively collected. In patients with a positive familial history of NPH, we defined the inheritance pattern when possible. The results of performed genetic tests were reported.
resultNine patients (9.5%) had a familial history of NPH. Familial and sporadic groups were largely comparable in age, sex, and disease duration. However, familial cases had better cognitive scores (p = 0.022) and a higher prevalence of upper-limb action tremor (56% vs. 14%; p = 0.008). No significant differences were noted in radiological markers, and both groups showed a positive response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel pathogenic NEIL1 variant in twin patients with familial NPH.
conclusionsFamilial NPH occurred in roughly 1 in 10 reviewed iNPH cases and demonstrates better cognition and increased tremor incidence compared to sporadic cases but otherwise similar characteristics. The genetic underpinning of these cases is heterogeneous and NEIL1 might represent another associated gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.