ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026
[ECG interpretation in rescue and emergency medical services in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Emergency physician interventions in the care of patients with acute coronary syndrome : Comparative, retrospective, observational study].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recording of an electrocardiogram (ECG) is an essential part of basic diagnostics in the emergency medical services (EMS). To provide initial care and make a preliminary diagnosis, paramedics and emergency physicians (EP) need knowledge about the ECG interpretation. Nevertheless, a few studies show that knowledge of ECG interpretation of paramedics and emergency physicians must improve.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the ECG interpretation skills among EMS staff and EP in Germany. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn online survey was conducted to assess these skills from 22 February to 22 March 2023. The survey collected details about gender, age, professional training, years of professional experience, time since the last ECG training, and self-rated ECG interpretation ability. Subsequently, 9 different ECG had to be interpreted in the form of single-choice questions.
resultsIn all, 908 participants (EMS: 803; EP: 105) were evaluated. The survey identified a knowledge deficit in the interpretation of ECG. On average, 63.3% (EMS: 61.4%; EP: 76.5%) of the ECG were interpreted correctly. The ECG with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of the posterior wall was identified correctly by 79.1% (EMS: 78.1%; EP: 86.7%) of the participants. Specific weak points in interpreting ECG were AV-blocks, tachycardias, atrial fibrillation, bundle branch blocks, pacemaker ECG and determining the ventricular axis. The participants' self-assessment of their ECG skills correlated significantly with the results actually achieved (p ≤ 0.001; p
conclusionBased on the lack of diagnostic skills in the interpretation of a 12 lead ECG, continuous education programs should be revised to improve the quality of patient care in prehospital emergency medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.