ArticleLung2025
Prevalence and Predictors of Response to Antifibrotics in Long-Term Survivors with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Article in Lung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interleukins: a bibliometric analysis [1999-2025].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Expression of complement pathway genes is associated with progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Home-based rehabilitation in interstitial lung disease: picturing the present and drawing the future through a systematic review of the literature.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Exploring diagnostic gene markers and immune infiltration in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe natural history of IPF remains unpredictable despite antifibrotic treatment. In addition, some patients discontinue treatment due to the occurrence of adverse events. To date, no data exist on either the effect of long-term treatment or predictors of treatment response. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the functional trajectory of IPF patients treated with antifibrotics for at least three years and to establish predictors of treatment response.
methodsThis multicenter study enrolled long-term survivors IPF patients provided they had stopped treatment for no longer than one month during at least three-year study period. Based on the absolute decline of FVC%predicted (pred.) observed during the 3-year treatment and normalized per year, patients were defined as progressors (≥ 5%) or non-progressors (< 5%).
resultsWe identify 172 IPF patients who completed three years of antifibrotic treatment with no interruption. The 27% of these IPF patients progressed despite complete adherence to treatment. Progressors were more likely to be non-smokers compared to non-progressors, with higher occurrence of diarrhea and with a more preserved lung function at diagnosis. FVC %pred. and liters at diagnosis, a greater FVC decline in the 1-st year of follow up, being non-smokers, and complaining of diarrhea over treatment are independent predictors of progression.
conclusionAlmost one third of IPF patients adherent to three years of antifibrotics experience progression. A functional decline at first year of treatment despite preserved lung function at diagnosis, non-smoking status, and occurrence of diarrhea over treatment are independent predictors of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.