ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Switching JAK inhibitors: evaluating baricitinib's effectiveness in alopecia areata after tofacitinib failure.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends in Janus Kinase Inhibitor (JAKi) Use Across Five European Countries: A DARWIN EU Network Study.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Loss of JAK inhibitor efficacy and subsequent rescue in a pediatric case of alopecia universalis.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Oral Tofacitinib Treatment for Alopecia Areata at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Alopecia in Jordanian Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Longitudinal clinical course, treatment outcomes, and relapse patterns in alopecia areata: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is a condition of hair loss with an immune-mediated cause. The efficacy of switching to a different JAK inhibitor in a patient who has failed to respond to one JAK inhibitor for AA is also unknown. This review is to examine the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients' inadequate response to tofacitinib. This is a retrospective study of 26 patients with AA who were switched from tofacitinib to baricitinib because of insufficient response, side effects or disease relapse. The patients had a mean age of 31 years, with 65% being female. The SALT score was reduced from 90 ± 19 to 68 ± 31 (p < 0.05) in an average of 16 months of tofacitinib treatment. However, the SALT score was reduced from 68 ± 31 to 50 ± 31 (p < 0.05) in about 7 months of baricitinib treatment. 34.6% of patients taking tofacitinib and 19.2% of patients receiving baricitinib did not respond to the treatment; however, 66.66% of the tofacitinib non-responders had improvement with baricitinib. Of the five patients with unchanged SALT scores after tofacitinib, four (80%) had an average reduction of 58.25 points with baricitinib. Baricitinib induced eyebrow and eyelash regrowth in 60% of AU (Alopecia Universalis) patients. Both treatments brought down SALT scores in pediatric cases. Adverse effects were mild and were noted in 30.76% of patients on tofacitinib and 3.84% of patients on baricitinib treatment. Oral baricitinib is safe with minimal side effects and also effective for both pediatric and adult AA patients who are inadequate responders to tofacitinib. These findings need to be confirmed by further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.