ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Comparative evaluation of lower respiratory tract microbiota in healthy and BRD-affected calves in Egypt.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Lung Bacterial Community Profiles in Pneumonic and Non-Pneumonic Akkaraman Lambs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review: Molecular Diagnostics and Multi-Omics Approaches to Understanding Bovine Respiratory Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies has uncovered the importance of commensal microbial populations in the lower respiratory tract (LRT) for mucosal health and their role in the development of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare the LRT microbiota in healthy and BRD-affected calves in Egypt. After assessing clinical respiratory scores in both groups, post-mortem lung samples from the cranial lobes of six clinically healthy calves and six calves affected by BRD were collected following slaughter. The most prevalent bacterial families in all samples were Moraxellaceae (11.06%), Enterobacteriaceae (8.23%), and Flavobacteriaceae (8.13%). The most common bacterial genera across all samples were Acinetobacter (13.1%), Gracilibacillus (7.9%), and Pseudomonas (5.0%). Notably, the overall microbial community structures differed significantly between healthy and BRD-affected calves. Alpha diversity analysis revealed significant differences in the Shannon (p = 0.0043) and Chao1 (p = 0.0001) indices between the two groups. This study highlights the substantial impact of BRD on the LRT microbiota of calves, highlighting the intricate relationship between host health and the LRT microbial ecosystem. Further investigations involving a larger sample size are necessary to establish the clinical significance of LRT microbiota in maintaining bovine respiratory health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.