ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
ROTEM's utility in guiding resuscitation of traumatic lower extremity fracture patients.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a method for real-time detection of clotting derangements allowing for targeted blood product resuscitation. We sought to determine if coagulopathy profiles differed based on fracture location (comparing pelvic versus tibia and femur fractures), if ROTEM profiles correlated between both total hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and if ROTEM profiles correlated with patients undergoing an immediate definitive fixation versus an early damage control approach to care. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a level 1 trauma registry database. ICD codes were used to isolate operative lower extremity fractures that had a ROTEM on admission. Two cohorts were created: (1) stratification by fracture location including pelvis, femur, and tibia (n = 498) and (2) stratification by fixation method including external fixation versus early definitive fixation (n = 154). The fracture location cohort assessed length of stay parameters while the fixation cohort assessed fixation approaches with ROTEM profiles.
resultsThe majority of fracture location patients with ROTEM APTEM and ROTEM EXTEM profiles were physiologically coagulable with all three fracture locations. Most patients with ROTEM INTEM profiles showed hypocoagulable derangements with femur (75.2%), tibia (68.1%), and pelvic fractures (68.8%). Fractures classified as ROTEM APTEM hypocoagulable indicated a longer hospital LOS (r = 0.282) and ICU LOS (r = 0.510). No correlation was found between coagulopathy profiles and fixation approaches.
conclusionsROTEM studies on fracture types showed little consensus on ROTEM profiles correlating to a specific fracture location. ROTEM profiles collected showed limited predictive ability of a patient's hospital and ICU LOS. Early definitive fixation versus external fixation did not correlate between specific ROTEM profiles. Overall, there did not appear to be utility in routine use of ROTEM in fracture patients and this should be limited to those with severe multisystem injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.