ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Retinal Arteriovenous Information Improves the Prediction Accuracy of Deep Learning-Based baPWV Index From Color Fundus Photographs.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal vascular parameters as AI-driven biomarkers for pulse wave velocity assessment: a telemedicine strategy for cardiovascular risk assessment.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based pachychoroid index based on choroidal image patterns of central serous chorioretinopathy using enhanced-depth-imaging optical coherence tomography.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Inter-Relationships Between the Deep Learning-Based Pachychoroid Index and Clinical Features Associated with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the prediction accuracy of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) from color fundus photographs (CFPs) using different deep learning models. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 696 participants whose baPWVs and CFPs were obtained during medical checkups. Arteriolar and venular probability maps, which were automatically calculated from the CFPs based on our modified deep U-net, Hokkaido University retinal vessel segmentation (HURVS) model, were applied as channel attention to retinal vessel location information to predict baPWV. The baPWV prediction parameters consisted of predicted baPWVs from a single-input model using CFPs only and from a three-input model using CFPs, and arteriolar and venular probability maps. The single- and three-input models adopted a common depth-wise net and were separately pretrained and trained with fivefold cross-validation. These baPWV prediction parameters were corrected using multiple regression equations with age, sex, and systolic blood pressure and were defined as single- and three-input regression-predicted baPWVs. The main outcome measures were the correlation coefficients between true baPWV and the baPWV prediction parameters. Results: The correlation coefficient with true baPWVs was higher for the three-input predicted baPWVs (R = 0.538) than for the single-input predicted baPWVs (R = 0.527). After regression, the three-input, regression-predicted baPWVs (R = 0.704) had the highest prediction accuracy, followed by the single-input, regression-predicted baPWVs (R = 0.692). Conclusions: The three-input model predicted true baPWVs with high accuracy. This improved prediction accuracy by channel attention to the arteriolar and venular probability maps based on the HURVS model confirmed that arterioles and venules are relevant regions for baPWV prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.