Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998457›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Navigating the transition: assessing continuity and loss in endocrinology care.

Hatice Nursoy, Erhan Hocaoglu, Muge Yasar, Filiz Mercan Saridas, Kadircan Karatoprak, Ozen Oz Gul, Soner Cander, Canan Ersoy, Elif Ezirmik, Yasemin Denkboy Ongen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Erhan Hocaoglu
Muge Yasar
Filiz Mercan Saridas
Ozen Oz Gul
Soner Cander
Canan Ersoy
Elif Ezirmik
Yasemin Denkboy Ongen
Omer Tarim
Erdinc Erturk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transition describes preparing children with chronic illnesses for adult healthcare and gradually transferring their care, starting late adolescence. Joint meetings and visits are recommended during this process. This study examines an 8-year transition experience in our clinic, focusing on the differences between adult and pediatric endocrinology practices and the rates of loss to follow-up in specific disease groups. Methods: Three hundred thirty-five patients evaluated in transition meetings were included. The frequency of visits 1 year before transition, during the first and second years after transition, the number of patients lost to follow-up and disease groups were analyzed. Results: Among the patients discussed in the transition meetings, 56.3% participated in joint visits. Post-transition, 82.5% of patients continued their follow-up care, while 17.5% were lost to follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of visits before and after the first year of transition (P = 0.000). Conclusion: To increase adaptation during the transition, informing patients and families about the process at every visit after late adolescence is beneficial. Moreover, scheduling joint visits on flexible dates and increasing the number of joint visits per patient could substantially enhance patient participation and follow-up rates. We observed that patient follow-up frequency was higher in pediatric endocrinology due to differences in pediatric and internal medicine practices.

Indexed as

adult health carecongenital adrenal hyperplasiadiabetes mellitushyperthyroidismpediatric endocrinologypediatric healthcarepituitary disorderstransitiontransition from pediatric to adult care

Identifiers

PMID39998457
PMCPMC11906147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.