Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998070›Full record

ArticleToxins2025

The Evaluation of a New ELISA-Based Kit for Total Microcystins as an Early Detection Tool for Microcystin Blooms in Source Waters and Its Application State-Wide to Oregon Source and Finished Drinking Waters.

Katie Adams, Kale Clauson, William A Adams, Rochelle G Labiosa, Theresa McBride, Aaron Borisenko, Stuart W Dyer, Ned Fairchild, Barry V Pepich

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie AdamsRegion 10 Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 7411 Beach Dr E., Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA.
Kale ClausonOregon Department of Environmental Quality, 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite 600, Portland, OR 97232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-7495
William A AdamsOffice of Ground Water and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Rochelle G LabiosaRegion 10 Water Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Theresa McBrideRegion 10 Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 7411 Beach Dr E., Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9885-230X
Aaron BorisenkoOregon Department of Environmental Quality, 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite 600, Portland, OR 97232, USA.
Stuart W DyerOregon Health Authority, 500 Summer St. NE, Salem, OR 97301, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6722-2765
Ned FairchildOregon Department of Environmental Quality, 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite 600, Portland, OR 97232, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-0064-0187
Barry V PepichRegion 10 Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 7411 Beach Dr E., Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to cyanobacterial toxin (cyanotoxin) contamination issues in 2018, the city of Salem, Oregon, issued a 33-day do-not-drink advisory for vulnerable people among the 200,000 residents. After the incident, the state of Oregon put in place drinking water rules to require the routine testing of raw water, as well as finished water, in cases where the raw water cyanotoxin concentrations exceeded trigger values. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) total microcystins drinking water health advisory level (HAL) for small children is 0.3 µg/L. This is equivalent to the minimum reporting level (MRL) for EPA Method 546. Consequently, there was no ability to provide early warnings via toxin testing for total microcystins using the EPA method. In this study, we performed a comparison of the precision and accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) described in the EPA method to a more sensitive assay, the Streptavidin-enhanced Sensitivity (SAES) assay. Based on these precision and accuracy studies and quantitation limit determinations and confirmations, the EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW) has concluded the SAES kit meets the requirements of EPA Method 546. With an MRL that is one-third of the original concentration, the new kit provides a small but critical window for identifying early warnings. Challenges remain with providing early warnings due to the variability in bloom dynamics; however, the new MRL allowed Oregon to lower the trigger level for susceptible systems, thereby providing an additional early warning.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterEnvironmental MonitoringMicrocystinsWater MicrobiologyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansOregonDrinking WaterMicrocystinscyanobacteriadrinking waterELISAmicrocystinreference method

Identifiers

PMID39998070
PMCPMC11861646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.