ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
A Retrospective Study of Clinical Biomarkers of Severe Dengue in a Tertiary Hospital in Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early diagnostic value of dengue virus NS1 antigen and nucleic acid testing.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of severe dengue remains a clinical challenge. This retrospective study evaluated clinical features and laboratory biomarkers associated with severe dengue at Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru from 1 January 2022 to 31 March 2023. Records of 99 patients, categorized into ICU (51) and non-ICU (48) groups, were identified and analyzed using SPSS version 28.0. Sociodemographic details, clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were collected. Patients aged 50 and older, those with obesity, and those with pre-existing comorbidities were significantly more likely to be admitted to the ICU. The four most common warning signs in both cohorts were lethargy/restlessness/confusion, abdominal pain, persistent vomiting, and diarrhea. Fever, or history of fever, and thrombocytopenia were the two most common severe dengue criteria present in both cohorts. ICU patients exhibited more signs of plasma leakage and abnormal laboratory findings, including normal white cell count, hypoalbuminemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated creatine kinase. In contrast, leukopenia and normal albumin, bilirubin, and creatine kinase levels were more common in non-ICU patients. Hyponatremia and raised lactate dehydrogenase were seen in both groups. This study highlighted key differences and similarities in clinical features and laboratory biomarkers between ICU and non-ICU patients, emphasizing the need for further research to develop a comprehensive risk assessment tool for predicting severe dengue that resulted in ICU admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.