Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998013›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Operational Definitions of Polypharmacy and Their Association with All-Cause Hospitalization Risk: A Conceptual Framework Using Administrative Databases.

Stefano Scotti, Lorenza Scotti, Federica Galimberti, Sining Xie, Manuela Casula, Elena Olmastroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefano ScottiEpidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-8881-5912
Lorenza ScottiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale UPO, 13100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-9058
Federica GalimbertiIRCCS MultiMedica, 20099 Sesto San Giovanni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4231-4150
Sining XieEpidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-9135
Manuela CasulaEpidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5124-5361
Elena OlmastroniEpidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-243X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of multiple medications, increases the risk of various adverse outcomes. However, the variability in definitions across the literature contributes to substantial heterogeneity. Building on the published literature, this study aimed to identify a set of operational definitions of polypharmacy applicable to administrative databases and to assess their association with all-cause hospitalization. Data from the pharmacy refill and hospitalization databases of the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy, were analyzed. Patients aged ≥40 with at least one reimbursed drug prescription in 2017 were included. Prescription coverage was evaluated using total defined daily doses (DDDs), and all-cause hospitalizations from January to June 2018 were considered. Definitions explored included (i) the WHO's criterion of ≥5 medications by ATC fourth-level code; (ii) the exclusion of prescriptions usually for short-term treatments; and (iii) drugs with cumulative annual DDD ≥ 60. Approaches were assessed annually, quarterly, and monthly, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for hospitalization risk. Among 431,620 patients, the DDD ≥ 60 definition showed the least variability (20.47-21.16%) and identified an older more complex cohort. All definitions showed a dose-dependent association with hospitalization risk. Different definitions of polypharmacy result in varying prevalence, with DDD ≥ 60 being the most consistent. A patient-centric approach is crucial to assess the appropriateness of polypharmacy.

Indexed as

administrative databasesdrug exposureepidemiologic methodshospitalization riskoperational definitionspolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID39998013
PMCPMC11859879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.