ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact and Enablers of Pharmacogenetic-Informed Treatment Decisions-A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study Exploring the Patient Perspective.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician Experiences at the Frontier of Pharmacogenomics and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management.Health services insights · 2025Article
- A Swiss Cross-Sectional Study on Patients' Perspectives on Chronic Pain Management, Analgesic Treatment, and Genetic Susceptibility.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing is a promising approach for optimizing drug therapies. However, there is limited knowledge regarding its real-world utilization and long-term impact in clinical practice. This study assessed how often PGx information informs treatment decisions and evaluated patients' perspectives on its use and non-use, identifying enablers for PGx implementation. A mixed-methods study was conducted with 24 patients with a median of 1 year after PGx testing. Medication and health-related data were collected at enrollment and at the follow-up 1 year later using a semi-structured questionnaire. At the follow-up, 62 medication changes were identified in 18 patients. A median of four medication changes per patient were initiated mainly by medical specialists (58%). PGx information was considered for 15 patients in 39 medication changes (63%). Patient-reported factors contributing to the non-use of PGx information included a lack of knowledge and interest among healthcare professionals (HCPs), structural and administrative barriers, and an over-reliance on patient advocacy. Potential enablers should address targeted PGx education, interprofessional collaboration, awareness among policymakers, and concise recommendations focused on PGx-actionable drugs from testing providers. By implementing these interdependent enablers, PGx can evolve into a long-term, clinically integrated cornerstone of individualized pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.