Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39998010›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Exploring the Benefits, Barriers and Improvement Opportunities in Implementing Automated Dispensing Cabinets: A Qualitative Study.

Abbas Al Mutair, Alya Elgamri, Kawther Taleb, Batool Mohammed Alhassan, Mohamed Alsalim, Horia Alduriahem, Chandni Saha, Kawthar Alsaleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abbas Al MutairAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9471-2767
Alya ElgamriFaculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum 11111, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-6423
Kawther TalebAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.
Batool Mohammed AlhassanAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed AlsalimAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.
Horia AlduriahemAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.
Chandni SahaAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.
Kawthar AlsalehAlmoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 36342, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology has increasingly influenced the provision of healthcare services by enhancing patient safety, optimising workflows, and improving efficiency. Large healthcare facilities have adopted automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) as an advanced technological solution. A key gap exists in understanding the ADC implementation experience in different contexts. Therefore, this study seeks to fill this literature gap by exploring key stakeholders' perspectives on the benefits, barriers, and improvement opportunities related to ADCs, offering valuable insights to support their effective integration across various healthcare settings. This qualitative study was conducted in Saudi Arabia. The implementation of ADCs generally has positive outcomes for all staff. The system has brought about enhanced medication tracking, greater time efficiency, along with reduced workload and medication errors. However, there are barriers to their implementation, including changes in workflow and workload distribution, cabinet design, technical medication management challenges, and the need for staff training. To maximise the effectiveness of ADCs, healthcare organisations should focus on improving operational workflows, providing ongoing staff training, and maintaining robust system monitoring. Additionally, manufacturers should focus on advancing technology to further enhance the efficiency and functionality of ADCs.

Indexed as

ADCautomated dispensing cabinetsbarriersbenefitsimprovement opportunities

Identifiers

PMID39998010
PMCPMC11859922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.