Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997925›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

Next Generation Risk Assessment to Address Disease-Related Vulnerability-A Proof of Concept for the Sunscreen Octocrylene.

María-Elena Fernández-Martín, Jose V Tarazona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

María-Elena Fernández-MartínISCIII-UNEP PhD Programme on Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-6300
Jose V TarazonaRisk Assessment Unit, National Environmental Health Centre, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Carretera de Majadahonda a Pozuelo km 2.200, 28220 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-3055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment for cosmetics in the European Union (EU) are triggered by a ban on animal testing and concerns of endocrine disruption (ED). The risk assessment focuses on healthy populations and, for potential ED, includes specific developmental stages as vulnerable due to specific concerns on endocrine effects. However, the assessment focuses on healthy individuals and does not consider that some pathologies may increase dermal absorption and even vulnerability to endocrine disruptors. Data from the EU risk assessment, human pharmacokinetic studies and ToxCast bioactivity were combined in a hypothesis-driven Next-Generation Risk Assessment to identify possible risk drivers for vulnerable populations including oncological patients and atopic dermatitis. In vitro effects are observed at concentration in the order of measured plasmatic levels under normal use patterns. The induction of hepatic enzymes is the most relevant bioactivity endpoint, in line with animal findings. The information on endocrine potential is inconclusive, and the possibility for skin effects and endocrine mechanism linked to tumor induction require further elucidation. The information on octocrylene (CAS number: 6197-30-4) bioactivity is limited, lacking information on the metabolites and the immunotoxicity potential, particularly relevant for oncological patients.

Indexed as

atopic dermatitiscosmeticsendocrine disruptorsNGRAoctocryleneoncological patientrisk assessmentUV filters

Identifiers

PMID39997925
PMCPMC11861732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.