ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Existence and Stability Mechanism of Bulk Nanobubbles: A Review.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negatively Charged Submicron Heterogeneities in Aqueous Solutions of Biomolecules as Alkaline Membraneless Organelles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Mesoscopic Inhomogeneities in Ethanol-Water Mixtures: Are They Nanobubbles, Impurity Aggregates, or Nanoscale Gas-Water Composite Structures?Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Smaller Oxygen Nanobubbles More Effectively Suppress Colitis and Colon Carcinogenesis than Larger Oxygen Nanobubbles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- How volatile components stabilize bulk nanobubbles: a model study.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Long-Term Stability of Nanobubbles Generated via Pressure Oscillation-Hydrodynamic Cavitation: A Rapid Assessment by UV-Vis Spectrophotometry.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since they were shown to be a potential phenomenon through experimentation, bulk nanobubbles (BNBs) have been a long-standing controversy. The controversy mainly originates from the fact that their stability cannot be well explained by the established theories. Although nanobubbles have been applied in many fields, the controversial stability issue has been a hanging "cloud" looming over the nanobubble research. This review focuses on why the stability of nanobubbles cannot be depicted by the current theories from thermodynamics and dynamics perspectives. Moreover, a number of current models pertaining to bulk nanobubble stability are compiled. It is anticipated that this review will give readers a better grasp of the current state of bulk nanobubble research and provide some insight for further studies in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.