ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Encapsulation of Illite Powders with Al
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two hydrophilic copolymers containing functional groups such as carboxyl, amido, and sulfonic acid are synthesized using ammonium persulfate-catalyzed free radical polymerization in water. Aluminum sulfate is then introduced, resulting in two polymer complexes that exhibit reduced cement setting times (initial, 1.16-2.44 min; final, 2.02-3.14 min) and improved compressive (24 h, 5.81-7.25 MPa) and flexural (24 h, 2.80-2.99 MPa) strengths compared to pure aluminum sulfate-facilitated cementing (initial, 19.11 min; final, 37.05 min; compressive, 24 h, 5.51 MPa; flexural, 24 h, 2.56 MPa). Following this, ball-milled illite powder is added, and the resulting admixtures further display slightly prolonged setting times (initial, 2.35-2.99 vs. 1.16-2.44 min; final, 3.98-4.35 vs. 2.02-3.14 min), along with comparable compressive strengths (5.85-7.11 vs. 5.81-7.25 MPa) and enhanced flexural strengths (3.92-5.83 vs. 2.80-2.99 MPa). Notably, a unique adhesive pozzolanic clinker, Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.