ArticleMembranes2025
Assessing a Multilayered Hydrophilic-Electrocatalytic Forward Osmosis Membrane for Ammonia Electro-Oxidation.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the years, the ammonia concentration in water streams and the environment is increasing at an alarming rate. Many membrane-based processes have been studied to alleviate this concern via adsorption and filtration. On the other hand, ammonia electro-oxidation is an approach of particular interest owing to its energetic and environmental benefits. Thus, a plausible alternative to combine these two paths is by using an electroconductive membrane (ECM) to complete the ammonia oxidation reaction (AOR). This combination of processes has been studied very limitedly, and it can be an area for development. Herein, we developed a multilayered membrane with hydrophilic and electrocatalytic properties capable of completing the AOR. The porosity of carbon black (CB) particles was embedded in the polymeric support (CBES) and the active side was composed of a triple layer consisting of polyamide/CB/Pt nanoparticles (PA:CB:Pt). The CBES increased the membrane porosity, changed the pores morphology, and enhanced water permeability and electroconductivity. The deposition of each layer was monitored and corroborated physically, chemically, and electrochemically. The final membrane CBES:PA:VXC:Pt reached higher water flux than its PSF counterpart (3.9 ± 0.3 LMH), had a hydrophilic surface (water contact angle: 19.8 ± 0.4°), and achieved the AOR at -0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Our results suggest that ECMs with conductive material in both membrane layers enhanced their electrical properties. Moreover, this study is proof-of-concept that the AOR can be succeeded by a polymeric FO-ECMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.