ArticleMethods and protocols2025
The Reconstructed Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM) Method for Non-Inferiority Analyses: A New Potential Application.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Pirtobrutinib Monotherapy for First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Non-Anchored Indirect Comparison Using Reconstructed Patient-Level Data.Hematology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The IPDfromKM method, or Shiny method, is an artificial intelligence tool that enables indirect comparisons between studies by reconstructing individual patient data (IPD) from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. The IPDfromKM method is generally used for superiority analyses, but a further application could be represented by non-inferiority analyses. However, there are no studies supporting this methodological hypothesis. The aim of this work was to validate the IPDfromKM method for non-inferiority analyses by "exploiting" the well-described non-inferiority of implantable devices occluding the left atrial appendage compared to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the PubMed database and found five studies. The R software (version 4.3.3) was used to perform a standard survival analysis comparing Watchman and Amlet devices with warfarin. The hazard ratio (HR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was the main parameter of our analysis. The results confirmed the non-inferiority of Amlet and Watchman compared to warfarin (HR of Watchman vs. warfarin: 1.23, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.9; HR of Amlet vs. warfarin: 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.80). Therefore, we proposed a new application of the IPDfromKM method that could be potentially relevant in decision-making for the management of this common cardiac arrhythmia and a wide range of other pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.