ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Evaluating Bioassays for the Determination of Simvastatin's Osteogenic Activity: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Simvastatin Enhances Stem Cell Osteogenesis and Reduces Peri-Implant Bone Loss: An In Vitro and a Randomized Clinical Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Design and Development of an Injectable Thermoresponsive Hydrogel for Controlled Simvastatin Release in Bone Repair Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Simvastatin on Odontoblastic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- The Mechanism of Simvastatin-Mediated M1 Macrophage Polarization Contributing to Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOsteogenic differentiation is a complex process, and its analysis requires several biomarkers. Allied with this, there are no standardized bioassays to monitor the activity of simvastatin in osteogenesis in vitro. Therefore, identifying the most efficient and sensitive bioassays may enhance the quality of in vitro studies, bridging the gap with in vivo findings, saving time and resources, and benefiting the community. This systematic review aimed to determine the most efficient bioassay for simvastatin's osteogenic activity in vitro, in terms of sensitivity. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn vitro studies evaluating undifferentiated mesenchymal cells treated with simvastatin were considered eligible. References were selected in a two-phase process. Electronic databases and the grey literature were screened up to September 2023. The Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Certainty in cumulative evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Data were analyzed considering extracellular matrix mineralization, alkaline phosphatase, and the expression of potential target genes, such as bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), collagen type I, Runt-related transcription factor 2, osterix, osteocalcin, and osteopontin.
resultsFourteen studies were included. A "probably low" or a "definitely low" risk of bias was assigned to the included studies. The simvastatin concentration ranged from 0.1 nM to 10 µM. Considering a minimum 4-fold increase, simvastatin caused robust mineralization of the extracellular matrix in four studies (4.0-, 4.4-, 5.0-, and 39.5-fold). Moreover, simvastatin substantially increased BMP-2 expression in mesenchymal cells in three studies (4-, 11-, and 19-fold).
conclusionTherefore, mineralization of the extracellular matrix and BMP-2 expression in mesenchymal cells are the most efficient bioassays for determining the osteogenic activity of simvastatin in vitro (high certainty level). These findings provide a standardized approach that can enhance the reliability and comparability of in vitro studies, bridging the gap with in vivo research and optimizing resources in the field of bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.