Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997579›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Recent Advancements in Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Wound Healing.

Jahnavi Shah, Dhruv Patel, Dnyaneshwari Rananavare, Dev Hudson, Maxwell Tran, Rene Schloss, Noshir Langrana, Francois Berthiaume, Suneel Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Black Sea-Derived Biomaterials for Wound-Healing Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Fungal-Derived Chitosan fromMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jahnavi ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-7845-8427
Dhruv PatelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Dnyaneshwari RananavareDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Dev HudsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Maxwell TranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rene SchlossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Noshir LangranaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Francois BerthiaumeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Suneel KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-8654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan is a positively charged natural polymer with several properties conducive to wound-healing applications, such as biodegradability, structural integrity, hydrophilicity, adhesiveness to tissue, and bacteriostatic potential. Along with other mechanical properties, some of the properties discussed in this review are antibacterial properties, mucoadhesive properties, biocompatibility, high fluid absorption capacity, and anti-inflammatory response. Chitosan forms stable complexes with oppositely charged polymers, arising from electrostatic interactions between (+) amino groups of chitosan and (-) groups of other polymers. These polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) can be manufactured using various materials and methods, which brings a diversity of formulations and properties that can be optimized for specific wound healing as well as other applications. For example, chitosan-based PEC can be made into dressings/films, hydrogels, and membranes. There are various pros and cons associated with manufacturing the dressings; for instance, a layer-by-layer casting technique can optimize the nanoparticle release and affect the mechanical strength due to the formation of a heterostructure. Furthermore, chitosan's molecular weight and degree of deacetylation, as well as the nature of the negatively charged biomaterial with which it is cross-linked, are major factors that govern the mechanical properties and biodegradation kinetics of the PEC dressing. The use of chitosan in wound care products is forecasted to drive the growth of the global chitosan market, which is expected to increase by approximately 14.3% within the next decade. This growth is driven by products such as chitoderm-containing ointments, which provide scaffolding for skin cell regeneration. Despite significant advancements, there remains a critical gap in translating chitosan-based biomaterials from research to clinical applications.

Indexed as

chitosandrug deliverypolymer complexeswound dressingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID39997579
PMCPMC11857049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.