ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Facial Recognition Algorithms: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Self-Supervised Framework for High-Fidelity 3D Face Reconstruction Using Learnable Gabor-Aware Texture Modeling.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Image recognition-based detection system for preventing accidental dislodgement of head-and-neck medical supplies in ICU patients: A feasibility randomized controlled trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- DBA-YOLO: A Dense Target Detection Model Based on Lightweight Neural Networks.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic literature review aims to understand new developments and challenges in facial recognition technology. This will provide an understanding of the system principles, performance metrics, and applications of facial recognition technology in various fields such as health, society, and security from various academic publications, conferences, and industry news. A comprehensive approach was adopted in the literature review of various facial recognition technologies. It emphasizes the most important techniques in algorithm development, examines performance metrics, and explores their applications in various fields. The review mainly emphasizes the recent development in deep learning techniques, especially CNNs, which greatly improved the accuracy and efficiency of facial recognition systems. The findings reveal that there has been a noticeable evolution in facial recognition technology, especially with the current use of deep learning techniques. Nevertheless, it highlights important challenges, including privacy concerns, ethical dilemmas, and biases in the systems. These factors highlight the necessity of using facial recognition technology in an ethical and regulated manner. In conclusion, the paper proposes several future research directions to establish the reliability of facial recognition systems and reduce biases while building user confidence. These considerations are key to responsibly advancing facial recognition technology by ensuring ethical practices and safeguarding privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.