Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997558›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Adapting Classification Neural Network Architectures for Medical Image Segmentation Using Explainable AI.

Arturs Nikulins, Edgars Edelmers, Kaspars Sudars, Inese Polaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arturs NikulinsFaculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-3356-4764
Edgars EdelmersFaculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-4426
Kaspars SudarsInstitute of Electronics and Computer Science, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9110-9065
Inese PolakaFaculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-7765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation neural networks are widely used in medical imaging to identify anomalies that may impact patient health. Despite their effectiveness, these networks face significant challenges, including the need for extensive annotated patient data, time-consuming manual segmentation processes and restricted data access due to privacy concerns. In contrast, classification neural networks, similar to segmentation neural networks, capture essential parameters for identifying objects during training. This paper leverages this characteristic, combined with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, to address the challenges of segmentation. By adapting classification neural networks for segmentation tasks, the proposed approach reduces dependency on manual segmentation. To demonstrate this concept, the Medical Segmentation Decathlon 'Brain Tumours' dataset was utilised. A ResNet classification neural network was trained, and XAI tools were applied to generate segmentation-like outputs. Our findings reveal that GuidedBackprop is among the most efficient and effective methods, producing heatmaps that closely resemble segmentation masks by accurately highlighting the entirety of the target object.

Indexed as

classification modelsexplainable artificial intelligenceimage segmentationmedical imagingneural networks

Identifiers

PMID39997558
PMCPMC11856553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.